(1) SHAKIR ALI (2) SHAHIDA ASLAM v CHANNEL 5 BROADCAST LTD [2018] EWHC 840 Ch D (Arnold J) 19/04/2018
The Claimants, in this misuse of private information case, had been successful, but had failed to beat a Part 36 offer (which in turn had failed to include/provide an apology).
The lack of an apology did not impact the usual costs consequences of failing to beat a Part 36 offer or make it unjust to impose the usual consequences.
Leave a Reply